Dear Christian

While living a life that is riddled with debt, most Americans have long since forgotten within the last century virtually every single person on this planet suffered through a horrible depression. In fact, while considering carrying major debt and borrowing from banks and lenders, most Christians have forgotten the bible discourages being a servant to the lender and encouraged a year of jubilee where all debts are forgiven every fifty years so that no one person could own another person. Today, especially in the Untied States, debt ridden lifestyles are considered normal, and there is good evidence this type of lifestyle is very serious and dangerous.

The following is an assumption that perhaps these days of living in debt are numbered. However, whether this information is right or wrong, to live debt free as much as possible will not hurt any of my readers. As a writer and researcher, I must mention something I was told years ago by someone with far more experience and gray hairs than I. He said, “Debt that does not make money is debt that can never be justified.” Today that makes more sense than anything else. There are some investors that use money to make money, but to them caution on the level business debt should also be reconsidered. However, whether my assumptions on consumer debt are right or wrong, there is nothing wrong in encouraging people to live debt free on what they have.

In fact, without paying the banking industry their due, the average consumer stands to be able to save and invest millions that are presently being thrown away to the moneylenders. With the following, we can only guess when these things will take place, if ever, but consider this view carefully.

Concerning the nearly half century of petrodollar warfare, here are some points I have gleaned from my back ground as a Christian and historian. I thought you would enjoy reading this. This concerns every nation on earth, but the most active players (by example) are and were France selling arms to Iraq between the two Gulf Wars and Iraq itself. News articles make it pretty clear; the French had sold arms before and between the two Gulf Wars in violation of sanctions, which is why they did not want a second invasion of Iraq. Everything is also connected to the French wanting the Euro to become the new petrodollar; therefore, the petrodollar was the reason for the first and second Gulf Wars. "The mother of all wars" Saddam Hussein promised was because he was betting the world had enough of the American Petrodollar domination. Saddam Hussein thought he could drive Kuwait to the Euro Petrodollar and the rest of the world would go along with it. He was wrong. Or, was he just ahead of his time?

If I am right, the conflict encircled around (the US) wanting to stop Iraq from trading in Euros for oil, not in weapons of mass destruction-- at least in the second war. So I ask—was the second war and perhaps the first Gulf War over blood for oil and have all parties taken sides—including the French? If I am right, the United States is trying to protect the value of the US dollar from devaluation as the world's petrodollar. If that is the case, was this last war for oil trading values. As of December 2007, hint: Iran and Venezuela and Russia who are all oil trading giants have shown major hints of having already gone with Euro in trading for oil. If that is the case, the Bank of England and the United States central banks would start to have a serious money lending crunch. This came to be in December 2008, and the result was the nationalization of the English and American banking systems. Why, because the petrodollars were not there to lend. So tax dollars were put in these banks to keep the cycle of spending going with what was hoped was no end.

I have been doing some serious research on this. It bothers me that most Americans know so little about the petrodollar. The smoking gun of what caused the Gulf Wars appears to be valuing of money not weapons of mass distraction. If I am right, the American dollar is in for serious hard times—at some point in the not so distant future.

I found evidence that Saddam Hussein was trading in Euros for oil prior to the second gulf War starting in 2000. Also, Russia, Venezuela and Iran, as mentioned, seem to have all started to trade in Euros for oil as of 2006 or 2007 at the latest. The reason I use the word (seem (s)) is because this information is blacked out of our media. As an analyst, I can only see the result of the United States dollar decline and the obvious lending crunch as of December 2008.

Article after article are saying the same thing. This explains the overnight shift at the beginning of 2006 to make bankruptcy nearly impossible in the Untied States. Our economy is twisting in the wind; while 2/3 of the entire world's currency was, in the past, exchanged by and for the Untied States, this Nation is an economic giant. So change most likely will come, hopefully slow in the petrodollar currency issue. Though there is no way of knowing when this currency change will come or has come exactly, but it appears to be inevitable slow or fast. I just hope our politicians and banking industry see it that way and don't pick more fights.

Money has always been the key factor in the history of warfare. A close friend of mine stated the following concerning this topic; I thought it applies:

"I'm sure most Americans find it difficult to keep up with politics and economics because their jobs and families take most of their attention. Of course, some folks work so hard-- their spare time is spent with recreation or diversion. Either way, it is difficult for “Joe Blow" to keep up with these issues. But an uninformed Joe may allow the United States to get into something far more serious than the Gulf War…" "The ironic thing is that liberals/progressives have blamed the Gulf War on money, even if they didn't or couldn't specify why. Although we're a republic, (many say we're a democracy, but we're not. Our representatives are selected democratically, but that's the extent of our democracy except in the few rare cases "the people" get to vote on an issue because the politicos are too cowardly to take a stand), I believe we're capitalist nation before all else. Our politicians are corporate bigwigs who have ties to corporations, the lobbyists pushing legislation all serve corporations. So, of course, Washington is concerned with possible devaluing of the dollar to the extent of trumping up a war." (Jeff)

 Petrodollar Mystery: Pg-2

Please direct all traffic to this web site and do not forward or reproduce this material in digital form.